Filter posts by category

Landmark Judgements

Public Interest Litigation
Judiciary Exam Tips, Landmark Judgements, Legal Concepts

Why Public Interest Litigation Is More Important Than Ever for Judiciary Aspirants

By / / 7 minutes of reading

Public interest litigation for judiciary aspirants has never been more critical, bridging legal theory and social justice in today’s India. This article explores its evolution, landmark cases, and exam relevance. Dive in to understand why mastering PIL is essential for your judicial career and how it empowers you to tackle real-world challenges!

Why Public Interest Litigation Is More Important Than Ever for Judiciary Aspirants Read More »

Burger King trademark dispute
Judiciary Exam Tips, Landmark Judgements, Trademark Law

Pune vs. US: The Burger King Trademark Dispute Heats Up in Supreme Court

By / / 9 minutes of reading

The Burger King trademark dispute just took a wild turn. The Supreme Court has hit pause on a Bombay High Court order, letting Pune’s iconic Burger King keep its name—for now—in a clash with the US fast-food giant. From a 2011 lawsuit to a 2025 showdown, this blog unpacks the legal tug-of-war, the stakes for both sides, and what it means for your judiciary prep. Dive in for the full scoop!

Pune vs. US: The Burger King Trademark Dispute Heats Up in Supreme Court Read More »

Interview-based recruitment
Judiciary Exam Tips, Interview Guidance, Job Updates, Landmark Judgements, Legal Updates

Interview-Based Recruitment Under Fire: Supreme Court’s Assam Ruling Explained

By / / 8 minutes of reading

Interview-based recruitment just got a reality check from the Supreme Court. In a landmark 2025 ruling, the Court upheld Assam’s cancellation of a 2016 constable hiring list, spotlighting how relying solely on interviews can breed arbitrariness and favoritism. This deep dive unpacks the State of Assam v. Arabinda Rabha case, its impact on judicial recruitment fairness, and what it means for your judiciary exam prep. Stay sharp—transparency’s the new game!

Interview-Based Recruitment Under Fire: Supreme Court’s Assam Ruling Explained Read More »

Transfer of Criminal Trials
Landmark Judgements, Legal Updates

Supreme Court Issues Latest 2025 Guidelines for Transfer of Criminal Trials and Appeals

By / / 4 minutes of reading

The Supreme Court has issued detailed guidelines for the transfer of criminal trials under Section 406 CrPC. In Shri Sendhur Agro & Oil Industries v Kotak Mahindra, the Court emphasized that transfers are allowed only in exceptional cases to ensure fair trials. Learn about the key factors and implications of this landmark judgment.

Supreme Court Issues Latest 2025 Guidelines for Transfer of Criminal Trials and Appeals Read More »

Refusal for Medical exam
Landmark Judgements, Legal Updates

Rape Victim’s Refusal for Medical Exam: SC Allows Adverse Inference! | Landmark 2025 Case Analysis ⚖️

By / / 5 minutes of reading

The Supreme Court ruled that rape victim refusal for medical exam can raise negative inferences against her. In State of Himachal Pradesh v Rajesh Kumar (2025 SC), the Court emphasized the importance of medical evidence in rape cases. Learn how this judgment impacts legal proceedings, victim credibility, and judiciary exam preparation. Stay updated with the latest legal insights!

Rape Victim’s Refusal for Medical Exam: SC Allows Adverse Inference! | Landmark 2025 Case Analysis ⚖️ Read More »

execution petitions
Landmark Judgements

Big Alert for Judiciary: SC Directs High Courts to Clear Execution Petitions in 6 Months | Full Case Analysis

By / / 5 minutes of reading

The Supreme Court of India has issued a landmark directive instructing all High Courts to ensure that pending execution petitions are resolved within six months. This decision, delivered in PERIYAMMAL (DEAD THR. LRS.) AND ORS v. V. RAJAMANI AND ANR. (2025 SC), aims to tackle delays in civil execution cases and ensure that decree-holders can reap the benefits of their decrees without unnecessary legal hurdles. Failure to comply will result in disciplinary action against trial court judges. This ruling is set to streamline execution proceedings and impact judiciary exams and legal practice across India. Read the full case analysis and its implications on judicial reforms.

Big Alert for Judiciary: SC Directs High Courts to Clear Execution Petitions in 6 Months | Full Case Analysis Read More »

Rights of Arrested Persons
Landmark Judgements, Legal Updates

Rights of Arrested Persons under BNSS 2023 Extended to GST & Customs Acts by Supreme Court | Full Analysis

By / / 6 minutes of reading

The Supreme Court in Radhika Agarwal v. Union of India (2025 SC) ruled that the rights of arrested persons under BNSS 2023 apply to GST and Customs Act arrests. The judgment also confirms that anticipatory bail is available under these laws. Read this detailed analysis of the landmark ruling!

Rights of Arrested Persons under BNSS 2023 Extended to GST & Customs Acts by Supreme Court | Full Analysis Read More »

Judge
Landmark Judgements

⚖️ Judicial Ethics: Why a Retired Judge’s Judgment Was Struck Down | CBI vs Naresh Prasad Agarwal

By / / 5 minutes of reading

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India quashed a judgment delivered by a retired Madras High Court judge, emphasizing that judges cannot retain case files or deliver judgments after demitting office. The case, State through CBI vs Naresh Prasad Agarwal (2024 SC), underscores the importance of judicial propriety and reinforces the principle that justice must not only be done but must also be seen to be done.

⚖️ Judicial Ethics: Why a Retired Judge’s Judgment Was Struck Down | CBI vs Naresh Prasad Agarwal Read More »

Sexual Assault
Landmark Judgements

Supreme Court on Sexual Assault: Bodily Injuries Not Necessary for Proof

By / / 5 minutes of reading

In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has reiterated that bodily injuries are not necessary to prove sexual assault, challenging a long-standing myth surrounding such cases. The judgment, delivered in the case of Dalip Kumar @ Dalli v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 SC), reflects a progressive stance on how trauma and victim behavior are perceived in legal proceedings.

Supreme Court on Sexual Assault: Bodily Injuries Not Necessary for Proof Read More »

Caste or Religion in Court Filings
Landmark Judgements

Caste or Religion in Court Filings: Supreme Court Issues Progressive Directive

By / / 6 minutes of reading

In a landmark judgment in Shama Sharma v. Kishan Kumar (2024 SC), the Supreme Court of India has banned the mention of caste or religion in court filings. This progressive ruling ensures judicial neutrality, upholds equality, and reinforces secular values in legal proceedings across all courts in India.

Caste or Religion in Court Filings: Supreme Court Issues Progressive Directive Read More »

Environmental Law
Landmark Judgements

Landmark Environmental Law Cases Every Judiciary Aspirant Should Know

By / / 6 minutes of reading

Landmark Environmental Law Cases Every Judiciary Aspirant Should Know: Understanding critical environmental law cases is essential for judiciary aspirants. These rulings define the intersection of legal frameworks and environmental conservation, offering vital insights into judicial activism and accountability.

Landmark Environmental Law Cases Every Judiciary Aspirant Should Know Read More »

Cashless Treatment
Landmark Judgements

Golden Hour Scheme: Supreme Court Pushes for Cashless Treatment in Road Accidents

By / / 5 minutes of reading

Supreme Court’s landmark judgment in the case of S. Rajaseekaran v. Union of India directs the Central Government to implement a cashless treatment scheme for road accident victims during the “golden hour.” This ruling emphasizes prompt medical care to save lives and highlights critical reforms under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Golden Hour Scheme: Supreme Court Pushes for Cashless Treatment in Road Accidents Read More »

Shopping Basket
Scroll to Top