Delhi High Court Rules Restaurant Service Charge is Not Mandatory: NRAI v. UOI Judgment Explained
In a landmark ruling in NRAI v. UOI (2025), the Delhi High Court declared that restaurant service charge is not […]
Filter posts by category
Landmark Judgements
Taj Trapezium Zone Tree Felling: Supreme Court Recalls 2019 Order to Protect Green Cover
The Supreme Court recalls 2019 order that allowed tree felling in the Taj Trapezium Zone (TTZ) without prior permission, reinforcing environmental protection in MC Mehta v. Union of India & Ors. (2025). Addressing illegal felling of 454 trees in Mathura-Vrindavan, the Court imposed penalties and mandated compensatory afforestation. Explore the ruling’s impact on agro-forestry and conservation efforts in the TTZ.
Taj Trapezium Zone Tree Felling: Supreme Court Recalls 2019 Order to Protect Green Cover Read More »
Supreme Court’s Big Move! National Task Force Against Student Suicides & Mental Health Crisis in Colleges ⚖️
The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Amit Kumar & Ors. versus Union of India & Ors. (2025 SC) addresses the mental health crisis in colleges by forming the National Task Force Against Student Suicides. Led by Justice S. Ravindra Bhat, this task force aims to tackle issues like ragging, caste discrimination, and academic pressure. Learn how this initiative can transform student welfare in higher education.
Supreme Court Orders Court Security Upgrades Nationwide: A Landmark Judgment
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Pradyuman B. vs Union of India (2023) mandates urgent court security upgrades nationwide. From CCTV installations to district-wise security plans, this landmark judgment aims to protect judges, lawyers, and litigants. Explore the legal insights, implications, and exam relevance for aspirants.
Supreme Court Orders Court Security Upgrades Nationwide: A Landmark Judgment Read More »
Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling: Maternity Benefits for Contractual Women Workers in Kavita Yadav Case 2023
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Kavita Yadav v. Secretary, Ministry of Family and Health Welfare (2023) ensures maternity benefits for contractual women workers. This landmark judgment extends benefits beyond contract expiration, promoting gender justice. Learn the legal insights, implications, and exam relevance for aspirants.
Supreme Court Guidelines on Arrest of Judicial Officers 2025 Explained
Arrest of Judicial Officers in India is a sensitive legal matter. The Supreme Court has set strict guidelines to balance judicial independence and accountability. From CJI approval to in-house procedures, this blog explores the legal framework, landmark cases, and 2025 updates for legal aspirants.
Supreme Court Guidelines on Arrest of Judicial Officers 2025 Explained Read More »
Madras High Court 2025: Wife Watching Porn, Self-Pleasure Not Cruelty on Husband
The Madras High Court in 2025 ruled that a wife watching porn or engaging in self-pleasure does not constitute cruelty on the husband unless it impacts the matrimonial relationship. This landmark judgment emphasizes spousal privacy, women’s autonomy, and fundamental rights under Article 21. Explore the case details, legal implications, and more—updated as of March 19, 2025!
Madras High Court 2025: Wife Watching Porn, Self-Pleasure Not Cruelty on Husband Read More »
Senior Advocates AOR Supreme Court Mandate 2025: A New Era for Legal Practice
The Senior Advocates AOR Supreme Court Mandate 2025 sets a new precedent, with the Supreme Court ruling in SCBA v. State of UP (2025) that Senior Advocates cannot appear without an Advocate-on-Record (AOR). This blog explores the 2013 Supreme Court Rules, the landmark judgment, and its implications for judiciary aspirants—perfect for prelims, mains, and viva voce. Stay updated as of March 18, 2025!
Senior Advocates AOR Supreme Court Mandate 2025: A New Era for Legal Practice Read More »
Preliminary Enquiry Not Mandatory Before FIR: Supreme Court Clarifies Preliminary Enquiry Lalita Kumari Pradeep Sharma Case
The Preliminary Enquiry Lalita Kumari Pradeep Sharma Case reshapes FIR registration norms, with the Supreme Court clarifying that Lalita Kumari (2014) doesn’t mandate preliminary enquiries in every case. This blog dissects the Pradeep Nirankarnath Sharma v. State of Gujarat ruling, its implications, and exam relevance for judiciary aspirants—perfect for prelims, mains, and viva voce. Stay updated as of March 18, 2025!
Supreme Court Issues Directions Against Misleading Ads: Self-Declaration Forms and Endorser Liability
The Supreme Court Issues Directions Against Misleading Ads in a landmark May 2024 ruling, clamping down on deceptive advertising with self-declaration forms and endorser liability. From influencers to FMCG giants, accountability is now key—backed by Article 21 and CCPA guidelines. For judiciary aspirants, this is exam-ready: consumer rights, regulatory frameworks, and more. This blog dives deep—case details, legal impact, and prep tips—clear, sharp, and packed. Let’s explore!
Supreme Court Issues Directions on Nursing Rooms: A Legal Win for Mothers
The Supreme Court Issues Directions on Nursing Rooms in a landmark 2025 ruling, declaring breastfeeding in public and workplaces must shed its stigma. Anchored in Article 21, this verdict mandates nursing facilities, securing dignity for mothers and health for infants. For judiciary aspirants, it’s a constitutional treasure—rights, duties, and reform collide. This blog dives in—case, law, and exam angles—clear, focused, and loaded. Let’s go!
Supreme Court Issues Directions on Nursing Rooms: A Legal Win for Mothers Read More »
Supreme Court Quashes MP Rule Barring Blind Candidates: A Win for Inclusive Judiciary
The Supreme Court Quashes MP Rule Barring Blind Candidates in a landmark 2025 ruling, declaring no one should miss judicial service just for a disability. Visually impaired aspirants can now join the bench—MP’s exclusionary rule is out, and equality’s in. For judiciary hopefuls, this is big: think Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, constitutional debates, and exam-ready insights. This blog dives deep—case details, implications, and prep tips—clear and sharp. Read on!
Supreme Court Quashes MP Rule Barring Blind Candidates: A Win for Inclusive Judiciary Read More »