The Supreme Court in Amar Jain v. Union of India (2025) recognized the right to digital access as part of Article 21, mandating accessible eKYC processes for persons with disabilities. Learn about the judgment, its constitutional significance, and its impact on digital inclusion.
Right to Digital Access Part of Right to Life under Article 21 : Supreme Court Read More »
Explore the key takeaways from the Ayodhya Verdict 2019, analyzing its legal and social implications. This guide covers the Supreme Court’s ruling, its impact on Indian law, and its societal consequences for law students and judiciary aspirants.
Key Takeaways from the Ayodhya Verdict 2019: Legal and Social Implications Read More »
Explore the Article 21 implications in the Pegasus spyware case, analyzing the Supreme Court’s stance on privacy versus national security. This guide offers insights for law students and judiciary aspirants preparing for 2025.
Role of Article 21 in the Pegasus Spyware Case: Balancing Privacy and National Security Read More »
The Supreme Court’s directive for 100% Waste Management in Delhi NCR in MC Mehta Case sets a new standard for environmental justice in 2025. This blog explores the ruling’s impact, legal implications, and preparation tips for Judiciary, APO, and JLO aspirants, ensuring you’re exam-ready for 2025.
MC Mehta Case: Supreme Court Orders 100% Waste Management in Delhi NCR 2025 Read More »
The Delhi High Court, in the case of Hamdard National Foundation India v. Patanjali Foods Limited & Anr. (2025), ordered Baba Ramdev to take down videos and advertisements containing his controversial “Sharbat-Jihad” remarks against Rooh Afza, a popular drink by Hamdard. This blog provides a detailed analysis of the Sharbat-Jihad Remarks Case Delhi High Court 2025, covering the court proceedings, legal arguments, and implications for Judiciary, APO, and JLO aspirants preparing for 2025 exams.
Delhi High Court Slams Baba Ramdev’s Sharbat-Jihad Remarks Read More »
In the 2025 case S.C. Garg v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr., the Supreme Court ruled that Res Judicata Applies to Criminal Cases, binding parties to prior findings in subsequent proceedings. This decision resolves judicial confusion. This blog explores Res Judicata Applies to Criminal Cases for Judiciary, APO, and JLO aspirants preparing for 2025 exams.
Res Judicata Applies to Criminal Cases Too: Supreme Court Clarifies Read More »
In the 2025 case Pinki v. State of Uttar Pradesh, the Supreme Court issued the SC Child Trafficking Guidelines 2025, canceling bail for 13 accused and mandating hospital license suspension for newborn trafficking. This ruling aims to curb child trafficking effectively. This blog explains the SC Child Trafficking Guidelines 2025 for Judiciary, APO, and JLO aspirants preparing for 2025 exams.
SC Child Trafficking Guidelines 2025: No Bail & Hospital May Lose License Read More »
In a 2024 ruling in Indian Medical Association v. Patanjali Ayurved, the Supreme Court issued a contempt notice in the Patanjali Misleading Ads Contempt case, slamming Patanjali for false medical claims under the Drugs and Magic Remedies Act, 1954. This verdict protects consumer rights. This blog explains the Patanjali Misleading Ads Contempt ruling for Judiciary, APO, and JLO aspirants preparing for 2025 exams.
SC Slams Patanjali! Contempt Notice Over Patanjali Misleading Ads Read More »
In the case Ariaswamy v. State of Tamil Nadu, the Supreme Court clarified that Forgery Before Court Section 195 CrPC does not apply to pre-court forgery, allowing prosecution without court permission. This ruling ensures justice for forged documents. This blog explains the Forgery Before Court Section 195 CrPC verdict for Judiciary, APO, and JLO aspirants preparing for 2025 exams.
Forgery Before Court? Supreme Court Clears Key Doubts Read More »
The Supreme Court said Wife Can Join Husband’s Defamation Suit in the 2025 case Spunklane Media v. Nivedita Singh. The Court ruled that a wife can be part of her husband’s defamation case. They share a family reputation. This blog explains the Wife Can Join Husband’s Defamation Suit ruling. It is simple for Judiciary, APO, and JLO aspirants preparing for 2025 exams.
Wife Can Join Husband’s Defamation Suit : Supreme Court Read More »
In a significant ruling, the Aadhaar Not Mandatory for Bank Operations stance was reinforced by the Supreme Court in the 2025 case MC Mehta v. Union of India. The Court questioned the Delhi Government for denying subsistence allowances to workers due to non-Aadhaar-linked accounts, asking, “Which law says bank accounts can’t be operated without Aadhaar?” This blog explores the Aadhaar Not Mandatory for Bank Operations ruling, its background, and implications for Judiciary, APO, and JLO aspirants preparing for 2025 exams.
Aadhaar Not Mandatory for Bank Operations: Supreme Court Read More »
Explore the Supreme Court on Lengthy Pleadings & AI in the 2025 case Annaya Kocha Shetty v. Laxmibai Narayan Satose, where the Court criticized bulky pleadings and AI-generated statements. Learn how Order 6 Rule 16 CPC empowers courts to strike out unnecessary pleadings. This blog delves into the Supreme Court on Lengthy Pleadings & AI ruling, its implications, and Order 6 Rule 16 CPC for Judiciary, APO, and JLO aspirants preparing for 2025 exams.
Supreme Court on Lengthy Pleadings & AI in Civil Suits Read More »
