• All
  • Current Affairs
  • Interview Guidance
  • Job Updates
  • Judiciary Exam Tips
  • Landmark Judgements
  • Law school
  • Legal Concepts
  • Legal Updates
  • Muslim Law
  • Trademark Law

Landmark Judgements

Landmark Judgements

Supreme Court on Bonus Rights: Charitable Trusts Must Pay Workers Bonus

By / / 16 minutes of reading

In Management of Worth Trust v. The Secretary, Worth Trust Workers Union (2025 SC), the Supreme Court ruled that charitable trusts running factories cannot deny workers their bonus rights under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, emphasizing employee welfare. Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and K. Vinod Chandran rejected the trust’s claim for exemption, ordering bonus payments within a month. This blog explores the Supreme Court on bonus rights, its implications, and its relevance for Judiciary, APO, and JLO aspirants preparing for 2025 exams.

Supreme Court on Bonus Rights: Charitable Trusts Must Pay Workers Bonus Read More »

Landmark Judgements

Essential vs Over Qualification in Govt Jobs: Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling in Jomon KK v. Shajimon P (2025 SC)

By / / 17 minutes of reading

In Jomon KK v. Shajimon P (2025 SC), the Supreme Court clarified that there is no universal rule to prefer candidates with higher qualifications over those with the essential qualification in government jobs, emphasizing fairness in the selection process. Justices Dipankar Datta and Manmohan upheld the exclusion of a candidate with a Syrang’s licence from the post of Boat Lascar, highlighting the need for a level playing field. This blog explores the Supreme Court on essential vs over qualification, its implications, and its relevance for Judiciary, APO, and JLO aspirants preparing for 2025 exams.

Essential vs Over Qualification in Govt Jobs: Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling in Jomon KK v. Shajimon P (2025 SC) Read More »

Dabur India Ltd v. State of Maharashtra
Landmark Judgements

Dabur India Ltd v. State of Maharashtra (2025 Bombay HC): Label Change Ordered for Fake Claims

By / / 11 minutes of reading

In Dabur India Ltd v. State of Maharashtra (2025 Bombay HC), the Bombay High Court ordered Dabur to remove terms like “anti-inflammatory,” “anti-bacterial,” and “analgesic” from its Dabur Meswak and Dabur Herb’l Anti-Bacterial Toothpaste Tulsi labels by June 2025, following concerns by the Maharashtra FDA. Justices G S Kulkarni and Advait M Sethna accepted Dabur’s undertaking, ensuring compliance with statutory provisions. This blog analyzes the case, its implications, and its relevance for Judiciary, APO, and JLO aspirants preparing for 2025 exams.

Dabur India Ltd v. State of Maharashtra (2025 Bombay HC): Label Change Ordered for Fake Claims Read More »

Imran Pratapgadhi v. State of Gujarat
Landmark Judgements

Case Analysis: Imran Pratapgadhi v. State of Gujarat (2025 SC) – A Landmark Judgment on Free Speech

By / / 15 minutes of reading

In Imran Pratapgadhi v. State of Gujarat (2025 SC), the Supreme Court quashed an FIR against Congress MP Imran Pratapgadhi, clarifying Section 173(3) BNSS 2023 on preliminary enquiry before FIR registration and emphasizing the protection of freedom of speech under Article 19(1)(a). Justices Abhay Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan addressed conflicts with Lalita Kumari (2014), setting a precedent for speech-related offences. This blog analyzes the case, its legal implications, and its relevance for Judiciary, APO, and JLO aspirants preparing for 2025 exams.

Case Analysis: Imran Pratapgadhi v. State of Gujarat (2025 SC) – A Landmark Judgment on Free Speech Read More »

Arrest Memo vs Grounds of Arrest
Landmark Judgements, Legal Updates

Arrest Memo vs Grounds of Arrest: Supreme Court’s Big Update in Ashish Kakkar Case 2025

By / / 16 minutes of reading

In a landmark ruling in Ashish Kakkar v. UT of Chandigarh (2025 SC), the Supreme Court clarified that an arrest memo does not fulfill the requirement of supplying grounds of arrest under Section 47 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023, setting aside the arrest and remand of the appellant. Justices MM Sundresh and Rajesh Bindal emphasized that non-compliance with this constitutional mandate under Article 22(1) vitiates the arrest. This blog provides a detailed analysis of the arrest memo vs grounds of arrest debate, its legal implications, and its significance for Judiciary, APO, and JLO aspirants preparing for 2025 exams.

Arrest Memo vs Grounds of Arrest: Supreme Court’s Big Update in Ashish Kakkar Case 2025 Read More »

₹15 Lakh Judicial Controversy
Legal Updates, Landmark Judgements

₹15 Lakh Judicial Controversy Ends: Justice Nirmal Yadav Acquitted by Chandigarh Court

By / / 14 minutes of reading

After a 17-year legal battle, the Chandigarh Court acquitted Justice Nirmal Yadav and three others in the ₹15 lakh judicial controversy on March 29, 2025. The CBI case, originating in 2008, involved a misdelivered cash packet meant for Justice Yadav but sent to Justice Nirmaljit Kaur. This blog explores the case’s history, key developments, and its significance for Judiciary, APO, and JLO aspirants preparing for 2025 exams.

₹15 Lakh Judicial Controversy Ends: Justice Nirmal Yadav Acquitted by Chandigarh Court Read More »

Supreme Court recalls 2019 order
Current Affairs, Landmark Judgements

Taj Trapezium Zone Tree Felling: Supreme Court Recalls 2019 Order to Protect Green Cover

By / / 11 minutes of reading

The Supreme Court recalls 2019 order that allowed tree felling in the Taj Trapezium Zone (TTZ) without prior permission, reinforcing environmental protection in MC Mehta v. Union of India & Ors. (2025). Addressing illegal felling of 454 trees in Mathura-Vrindavan, the Court imposed penalties and mandated compensatory afforestation. Explore the ruling’s impact on agro-forestry and conservation efforts in the TTZ.

Taj Trapezium Zone Tree Felling: Supreme Court Recalls 2019 Order to Protect Green Cover Read More »

National Task Force Against Student Suicides
Legal Updates, Landmark Judgements

Supreme Court’s Big Move! National Task Force Against Student Suicides & Mental Health Crisis in Colleges ⚖️

By / / 12 minutes of reading

The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Amit Kumar & Ors. versus Union of India & Ors. (2025 SC) addresses the mental health crisis in colleges by forming the National Task Force Against Student Suicides. Led by Justice S. Ravindra Bhat, this task force aims to tackle issues like ragging, caste discrimination, and academic pressure. Learn how this initiative can transform student welfare in higher education.

Supreme Court’s Big Move! National Task Force Against Student Suicides & Mental Health Crisis in Colleges ⚖️ Read More »

court security upgrades nationwide
Landmark Judgements

Supreme Court Orders Court Security Upgrades Nationwide: A Landmark Judgment

By / / 10 minutes of reading

The Supreme Court’s ruling in Pradyuman B. vs Union of India (2023) mandates urgent court security upgrades nationwide. From CCTV installations to district-wise security plans, this landmark judgment aims to protect judges, lawyers, and litigants. Explore the legal insights, implications, and exam relevance for aspirants.

Supreme Court Orders Court Security Upgrades Nationwide: A Landmark Judgment Read More »

maternity benefits for contractual women
Landmark Judgements

Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling: Maternity Benefits for Contractual Women Workers in Kavita Yadav Case 2023

By / / 10 minutes of reading

The Supreme Court’s ruling in Kavita Yadav v. Secretary, Ministry of Family and Health Welfare (2023) ensures maternity benefits for contractual women workers. This landmark judgment extends benefits beyond contract expiration, promoting gender justice. Learn the legal insights, implications, and exam relevance for aspirants.

Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling: Maternity Benefits for Contractual Women Workers in Kavita Yadav Case 2023 Read More »

Arrest of Judicial Officers
Landmark Judgements, Legal Concepts, Legal Updates

Supreme Court Guidelines on Arrest of Judicial Officers 2025 Explained

By / / 17 minutes of reading

Arrest of Judicial Officers in India is a sensitive legal matter. The Supreme Court has set strict guidelines to balance judicial independence and accountability. From CJI approval to in-house procedures, this blog explores the legal framework, landmark cases, and 2025 updates for legal aspirants.

Supreme Court Guidelines on Arrest of Judicial Officers 2025 Explained Read More »

Best Judiciary & Law Exams Online Courses
Youtube Facebook-f Whatsapp Instagram

Quick Links

About Us

Testimonials

Contact Us

Terms & Conditions

Courses

Judiciary Exam Courses

APO Exam Courses

Interview Guidance

Test Series

Help

Contact Us

Terms & Conditions

Privacy policy

Copyright © 2025 Doon Law Mentor

Shopping Basket
Scroll to Top