Filter posts by category

Landmark Judgements

Landmark Judgements

Same Sex Marriage Judgment: Legal Analysis of Supriyo Chakraborty 2023

Explore the Same Sex Marriage Judgment with Doon Law Mentor. This article analyzes the Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling on same-sex marriage and cohabitation, its constitutional implications, and legal reforms, offering critical insights for law students and lawyers studying equality and personal rights.

Same Sex Marriage Judgment: Legal Analysis of Supriyo Chakraborty 2023 Read More »

Landmark Judgements

N.M. Sahib Case: Legal Analysis of Pondicherry’s Integration in 1962

How does the N.M. Sahib Case shape India’s constitutional integration? Doon Law Mentor analyzes the 1962 ruling, exploring de facto and de jure integration, Article 1, and territorial sovereignty. Essential for judiciary aspirants studying constitutional law.

N.M. Sahib Case: Legal Analysis of Pondicherry’s Integration in 1962 Read More »

Landmark Judgements

Teen Bigha Corridor Case: Legal Analysis of Union of India v Sukumar Sengupta (1990)

What does the Teen Bigha Corridor Case reveal about India’s Constitution? Doon Law Mentor analyzes Union of India v. Sukumar Sengupta (1990), exploring sovereignty, cession, and Article 3. Essential for law students studying constitutional law.

Teen Bigha Corridor Case: Legal Analysis of Union of India v Sukumar Sengupta (1990) Read More »

Landmark Judgements

I R Coelho vs State of Tamil Nadu (2007): Comprehensive Legal Analysis of the Indian Constitution

I R Coelho vs State of Tamil Nadu (2007) 2 SCC 1 is a landmark case on the basic structure doctrine and Ninth Schedule immunity. Doon Law Mentor provides a detailed legal analysis for lawyers and law students, exploring its impact on judicial review and the Indian Constitution.

I R Coelho vs State of Tamil Nadu (2007): Comprehensive Legal Analysis of the Indian Constitution Read More »

Landmark Judgements

Ram Kishore Sen vs Union of India (1966): Comprehensive Legal Analysis of Territorial Sovereignty

Ram Kishore Sen vs Union of India AIR 1966 SC 644 is a landmark case on territorial sovereignty and constitutional amendments. Doon Law Mentor offers a detailed legal analysis for lawyers and law students, exploring the Indian Constitution’s framework, Article 3, and the Berubari Union transfer.

Ram Kishore Sen vs Union of India (1966): Comprehensive Legal Analysis of Territorial Sovereignty Read More »

Landmark Judgements

Haryana v. Punjab 2002: SYL Canal Water Dispute

State of Haryana v. State of Punjab (2002) 2 SCC 507 is a landmark case on inter-state water disputes and constitutional federalism. Doon Law Mentor offers a detailed legal analysis for lawyers and law students of this Haryana v, Punjab case relating to SYL canal water dispute, exploring the Indian Constitution’s framework, judicial review, and implications for federal disputes.

Haryana v. Punjab 2002: SYL Canal Water Dispute Read More »

Landmark Judgements

Kesavananda Bharati Case: Legal Analysis of the Basic Structure Doctrine

The Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973) introduced the Basic Structure Doctrine, limiting Parliament’s amendment powers. Explore the legal issues, Supreme Court’s reasoning, and implications for lawyers and law students with Doon Law Mentor’s expert analysis of this landmark judgment.

Kesavananda Bharati Case: Legal Analysis of the Basic Structure Doctrine Read More »

Landmark Judgements

S.R. Bommai Case : Legal Analysis of President’s Rule and Federalism

The S.R. Bommai Case (S.R. Bommai v. Union of India, AIR 1994 SC 1918) redefined President’s Rule under Article 356, strengthening federalism. Explore the legal issues, Supreme Court’s reasoning, and implications for lawyers and law students with Doon Law Mentor’s expert analysis of this landmark judgment.

S.R. Bommai Case : Legal Analysis of President’s Rule and Federalism Read More »

Job Updates, Landmark Judgements

Decoding Uttarakhand Judicial Services 2025 Supreme Court Challenge

The Uttarakhand Judicial Services 2025 exam faces a Supreme Court challenge for excluding blind and non-domiciled PwBD candidates. Learn about the case, legal issues, and implications for UKPCSJ 2025 aspirants. Prepare with Doon Law Mentor.

Decoding Uttarakhand Judicial Services 2025 Supreme Court Challenge Read More »

Landmark Judgements

Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling on Court Managers Regularization: A Step Toward Judicial Efficiency

The Supreme Court of India, in its May 2025 ruling in All India Judges Association vs Union of India, issued critical guidelines on Court Managers regularization across India. Learn about the Court’s directives, the role of Court Managers, the Assam Rules of 2018, and how this impacts judicial administration. A must-read for law students, judiciary aspirants, and legal professionals!

Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling on Court Managers Regularization: A Step Toward Judicial Efficiency Read More »

Landmark Judgements

Taj Trapezium Zone: SC’s ₹25,000 Fine Per Tree Explained with Forest Act & Article 142

On May 15, 2025, the Supreme Court imposed fines up to ₹25,000 per tree for illegal felling in the Taj Trapezium Zone (TTZ), invoking Article 142 powers in the M.C. Mehta v. Union of India case. This ruling aims to protect the Taj Mahal and TTZ environment under the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Learn about the penalties, legal framework, and UPSC 2025 relevance here!

Taj Trapezium Zone: SC’s ₹25,000 Fine Per Tree Explained with Forest Act & Article 142 Read More »

Shopping Basket
Scroll to Top