Filter posts by category

Landmark Judgements

Munnesh v. State of UP (2025 SC): New Supreme Court Guidelines on Bail and Anticipatory Bail

By / / 13 minutes of reading

In Munnesh v. State of UP (2025 SC), the Supreme Court issued new guidelines on bail and anticipatory bail, mandating petitioners to disclose their criminal antecedents in the petition synopsis. Justices Dipankar Datta and Manmohan warned that false disclosures could lead to petition dismissal, addressing the issue of non-disclosure that often misleads courts. This blog explores the Supreme Court guidelines on bail, their implications, and their relevance for Judiciary, APO, and JLO aspirants preparing for 2025 exams.

Munnesh v. State of UP (2025 SC): New Supreme Court Guidelines on Bail and Anticipatory Bail Read More »

Landmark Judgements, Job Updates

Supreme Court Guidelines on Setting Aside Selection Process: State of West Bengal v. Baishakhi Bhattacharyya (2025 SC)

By / / 16 minutes of reading

In State of West Bengal v. Baishakhi Bhattacharyya (2025 SC), the Supreme Court laid down 4 key principles for setting aside an entire selection process due to irregularities, upholding the cancellation of 25,000 teaching and non-teaching appointments by the West Bengal SSC in 2016. Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Sanjay Kumar emphasized systemic fraud, evidence standards, and the priority of process purity over candidate inconvenience. This blog explores the Supreme Court guidelines on setting aside selection process, their implications, and their relevance for Judiciary, APO, and JLO aspirants preparing for 2025 exams.

Supreme Court Guidelines on Setting Aside Selection Process: State of West Bengal v. Baishakhi Bhattacharyya (2025 SC) Read More »

Landmark Judgements

Supreme Court on Bonus Rights: Charitable Trusts Must Pay Workers Bonus

By / / 16 minutes of reading

In Management of Worth Trust v. The Secretary, Worth Trust Workers Union (2025 SC), the Supreme Court ruled that charitable trusts running factories cannot deny workers their bonus rights under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, emphasizing employee welfare. Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and K. Vinod Chandran rejected the trust’s claim for exemption, ordering bonus payments within a month. This blog explores the Supreme Court on bonus rights, its implications, and its relevance for Judiciary, APO, and JLO aspirants preparing for 2025 exams.

Supreme Court on Bonus Rights: Charitable Trusts Must Pay Workers Bonus Read More »

Landmark Judgements

Essential vs Over Qualification in Govt Jobs: Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling in Jomon KK v. Shajimon P (2025 SC)

By / / 17 minutes of reading

In Jomon KK v. Shajimon P (2025 SC), the Supreme Court clarified that there is no universal rule to prefer candidates with higher qualifications over those with the essential qualification in government jobs, emphasizing fairness in the selection process. Justices Dipankar Datta and Manmohan upheld the exclusion of a candidate with a Syrang’s licence from the post of Boat Lascar, highlighting the need for a level playing field. This blog explores the Supreme Court on essential vs over qualification, its implications, and its relevance for Judiciary, APO, and JLO aspirants preparing for 2025 exams.

Essential vs Over Qualification in Govt Jobs: Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling in Jomon KK v. Shajimon P (2025 SC) Read More »

Civil Judge Exam postponed
Job Updates

Andhra Pradesh Civil Judge Exam Postponed! Will 3 Years Practice Become Mandatory for Civil Judges?

By / / 12 minutes of reading

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has got Civil Judge Exam postponed , originally scheduled for April 16, 2025, due to a pending Supreme Court judgment in All India Judges Association v. Union of India (Writ Petition No. 1022/1989). The court is deliberating whether a minimum 3 years of practice should be mandatory for Civil Judge eligibility, impacting the recruitment of 50 posts (40 direct, 10 by transfer). This blog explores the postponement, the debate over 3 years practice, and its implications for Judiciary, APO, and JLO aspirants preparing for 2025 exams.

Andhra Pradesh Civil Judge Exam Postponed! Will 3 Years Practice Become Mandatory for Civil Judges? Read More »

4th April 2025 Top Current Affairs
Current Affairs

4th April 2025 Top Current Affairs for JudiciaryExams

By / / 13 minutes of reading

Stay informed with the 4th April 2025 Top Current Affairs for Judiciary, APO, and JLO exams, covering Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL)’s ₹593 crore contract with the Indian Air Force, Poonam Gupta’s appointment as RBI Deputy Governor, Odisha’s Sishu Vatika initiative, BIMSTEC agreements, and more. This blog provides detailed insights into defense, economic policy, education, and international relations to boost your 2025 exam preparation.

4th April 2025 Top Current Affairs for JudiciaryExams Read More »

Waqf (Amendment) Bill 2025
Current Affairs, Legal Updates

Waqf (Amendment) Bill 2025 Passed by Parliament : Top Features and Changes to Waqf Act 1995

By / / 12 minutes of reading

The Waqf (Amendment) Bill 2025, passed by Parliament on April 4, 2025, introduces significant reforms to the Waqf Act 1995, aiming to enhance transparency and efficiency in Waqf property management. Key features include renaming the Act to the Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency, and Development Act, removing Waqf by user, mandating non-Muslim representation in Waqf bodies, and allowing High Court appeals against tribunal decisions. This blog explores the bill’s key features, its journey through Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, and its relevance for Judiciary, APO, and JLO aspirants preparing for 2025 exams.

Waqf (Amendment) Bill 2025 Passed by Parliament : Top Features and Changes to Waqf Act 1995 Read More »

Dabur India Ltd v. State of Maharashtra
Landmark Judgements

Dabur India Ltd v. State of Maharashtra (2025 Bombay HC): Label Change Ordered for Fake Claims

By / / 11 minutes of reading

In Dabur India Ltd v. State of Maharashtra (2025 Bombay HC), the Bombay High Court ordered Dabur to remove terms like “anti-inflammatory,” “anti-bacterial,” and “analgesic” from its Dabur Meswak and Dabur Herb’l Anti-Bacterial Toothpaste Tulsi labels by June 2025, following concerns by the Maharashtra FDA. Justices G S Kulkarni and Advait M Sethna accepted Dabur’s undertaking, ensuring compliance with statutory provisions. This blog analyzes the case, its implications, and its relevance for Judiciary, APO, and JLO aspirants preparing for 2025 exams.

Dabur India Ltd v. State of Maharashtra (2025 Bombay HC): Label Change Ordered for Fake Claims Read More »

Current Affairs

3rd April 2025 Top Current Affairs for Judiciary, APO, and JLO Exams

By / / 12 minutes of reading

Stay updated with the 3rd April 2025 Top Current Affairs for Judiciary, APO, and JLO exams, covering Vandana Katariya’s retirement, the Waqf (Amendment) Bill 2025 in Lok Sabha, Kerala’s ASPA Award, Jayanta Bhattacharya’s NIH role, Niharika Singhania’s equestrian gold, and more. This blog provides detailed insights into sports, legal reforms, public administration, and international relations to boost your 2025 exam preparation.

3rd April 2025 Top Current Affairs for Judiciary, APO, and JLO Exams Read More »

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023
Legal Updates

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023: Ultimate Guide for Judiciary Exam Aspirants

By / / 14 minutes of reading

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS 2023) has replaced the Indian Penal Code (IPC), marking a historic shift in India’s criminal justice system. Notified on December 25, 2023, this new law aims to deliver citizen-centric justice by addressing modern crimes and aligning with democratic values. This blog provides an in-depth analysis of BNS 2023, its impact on Judiciary, APO, and law students, and actionable study tips for 2025 exams.

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023: Ultimate Guide for Judiciary Exam Aspirants Read More »

Imran Pratapgadhi v. State of Gujarat
Landmark Judgements

Case Analysis: Imran Pratapgadhi v. State of Gujarat (2025 SC) – A Landmark Judgment on Free Speech

By / / 15 minutes of reading

In Imran Pratapgadhi v. State of Gujarat (2025 SC), the Supreme Court quashed an FIR against Congress MP Imran Pratapgadhi, clarifying Section 173(3) BNSS 2023 on preliminary enquiry before FIR registration and emphasizing the protection of freedom of speech under Article 19(1)(a). Justices Abhay Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan addressed conflicts with Lalita Kumari (2014), setting a precedent for speech-related offences. This blog analyzes the case, its legal implications, and its relevance for Judiciary, APO, and JLO aspirants preparing for 2025 exams.

Case Analysis: Imran Pratapgadhi v. State of Gujarat (2025 SC) – A Landmark Judgment on Free Speech Read More »

Shopping Basket
Scroll to Top